A proposed £50 billion Thames estuary airport would bring together rail, freight logistics and aviation shifting more movement of goods to rail and reducing road congestion, according to architect Lord Foster, one of the promoters of the scheme.
Lord Foster welcomed reports that the government is considering the case for an estuary airport, and the extra airport capacity that it can provide, when it consults in March on options for retaining the UK’s aviation hub status as part of the nation’s aviation strategy.
Then team behind The Thames Hub proposals is made up of Foster + Partners, Halcrow and Volterra. The Thames Hub would includes a new £20 billion, 150 million passenger estuary airport, a four track orbital rail line and utilities spine and a new Thames crossing and barrier.
“We are aware that there is some confusion between our Thames Hub vision and the Mayor of London’s Shivering Sands proposals, which have become known as ‘Boris’ Island”, said Foster.
“The Mayor has expressed his support for the Thames Hub proposal, as have Douglas Oakervee and Bridget Rosewell, who developed the Boris Island proposals, and who are now part of the Thames Hub team.
“We believe that the economic case for the Thames Hub is compelling as Britain is already losing out to expanding European hubs. Our proposal comprehensively addresses the infrastructure needed to maximise the advantages of a new airport. The Thames Hub and proposed new airport project is part of a wider UK-wide initiative to bring together rail, freight logistics, aviation, energy generation and transmission, flood protection and regional development.
“It will shift more movement of goods to rail and reduce congestion on our road systems. Recognising the synergies between these different strands, it reaps many benefits and economies from their integration."
It is estimated that The Thames Hub would take 16 years to build at a cost of some £50bn. The airport would costs £20bn, orbital rail £20bn; barrier crossing and tidal power generation of green energy to power the airport £6bn; and improving infrastructure £4bn.
The following comments have been posted in response to this article:
Alongside the RSPB and a broad coalition of millions, we are wholly opposed to the construction of an airport anywhere in the Thames Estuary because of the immense damage it would cause to the area's internationally important wildlife and the wider environment. The whole issue was exhaustively investigated between 2002 and 2005 in the Government's Aviation White Paper. ALL the key players, including the aviation industry, contributed. The idea of an airport in the Thames Estuary was conclusively ruled out and upheld by the High Court. In addition to the unprecedented environmental damage and the resulting massive legal implications, the investigation found that an estuary airport did not make sense economically, would not meet the requirements of the aviation industry and presented a significantly higher risk of 'bird strike' than at any other major airport in the UK. It would potentially be the single biggest piece of environmental vandalism ever perpetrated in the UK. The Government would have to recreate any lost or damaged habitat elsewhere BEFORE work on the airport could start – and even then only if they could prove there is no alternative site for the expansion and it is in the overriding public interest. They would face a legal battle, which could last for years. Economically environmentally & ecologically this dangerous airport (BIRDSTRIKE!) is a complete non-starter Friends of the North Kent Marshes
Posted by: Gill Moore 25 Jan 2012| Job Title | Job Location | Job Position | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Associate Strategic Sourcing Director ... | Hampshire | Permanent | ||
| Best in Class Planning Manager ... | Wiltshire | Permanent | ||
| Bid Manager - Civil Engineering ... | Hertfordshire | Permanent | ||
| Business Development Director ... | Middle East | Permanent | ||
| Business Development Manager -... | WorldWide | Permanent | ||
| Business Intelligence Analyst ... | London | Permanent | ||
| More Jobs | ||||